<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Digg even need a Bury Option?</title>
	<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/</link>
	<description>Weekly Business Bookmarks for Internet Entrepreneurs</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Power of User Run Sites - The Digg Community Revolts &#124; Bookmark Bliss</title>
		<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-2584</link>
		<author>The Real Power of User Run Sites - The Digg Community Revolts &#124; Bookmark Bliss</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>[...] is more of the same. I thought this was extremely interesting in light of my previous article about members of the Digg community having the power to bury articles for no reason at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is more of the same. I thought this was extremely interesting in light of my previous article about members of the Digg community having the power to bury articles for no reason at [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hem acharya</title>
		<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1848</link>
		<author>hem acharya</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>i m waiting for your april month's stats...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i m waiting for your april month&#8217;s stats&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Links Round up - May 1st 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1846</link>
		<author>&#160; Links Round up - May 1st 2007</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 08:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Digg even need a Bury Option? - Chris Stark talks about the Digg bury option and how good articles are getting buried by a select group of diggers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Does Digg even need a Bury Option? - Chris Stark talks about the Digg bury option and how good articles are getting buried by a select group of diggers. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1844</link>
		<author>andy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 04:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>I'm a regular user of Digg and I think I hardly ever buried any stories...

I just skipped the stories that didn't interest me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a regular user of Digg and I think I hardly ever buried any stories&#8230;</p>
<p>I just skipped the stories that didn&#8217;t interest me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1834</link>
		<author>Bret</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/traffic/does-digg-even-need-a-bury-option/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Lately I haven't been visiting Digg.  Although when I did visit, almost daily, I was very careful when I opted to Bury something.  Something had to be extremely "lame" before I gave it a thumbs down.  Mostly, however, I'd Bury something only if I knew it was a duplicate.  That being said, a Bury option at some level must exist otherwise the "social" editorial portion becomes unbalanced.  If you give people the opportunity to give something a "thumbs up" you must also present the "thumbs down" option.  Unfortunately, once a "social editorial" site becomes popular and successful, "gaming" the system one way or the other is certain to follow.  Despite Digg's inherit weaknesses I still like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I haven&#8217;t been visiting Digg.  Although when I did visit, almost daily, I was very careful when I opted to Bury something.  Something had to be extremely &#8220;lame&#8221; before I gave it a thumbs down.  Mostly, however, I&#8217;d Bury something only if I knew it was a duplicate.  That being said, a Bury option at some level must exist otherwise the &#8220;social&#8221; editorial portion becomes unbalanced.  If you give people the opportunity to give something a &#8220;thumbs up&#8221; you must also present the &#8220;thumbs down&#8221; option.  Unfortunately, once a &#8220;social editorial&#8221; site becomes popular and successful, &#8220;gaming&#8221; the system one way or the other is certain to follow.  Despite Digg&#8217;s inherit weaknesses I still like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.213 seconds -->
